The November 17 conference, “The Tar Sands Come to Ontario: No Line 9,” was a big success. Three hundred people jammed into a lecture theatre at University of Toronto for the plenary session. Every seat was taken, more than fifty people stood or sat in the aisles, and an equal number listened from just outside the door.
The unusually large turnout for an educational teach-in shows clearly that there is now a basis for organized public initiatives against the threat of hazardous tar sands oil being piped across southern Ontario and Toronto through Enbridge Inc.’s “Line 9.”
The all-day conference, which included sixteen workshops led by thirty-five speakers and facilitators, was attended by close to four hundred participants in all.
The initial session featured sixteen speakers in six simultaneous workshops. Each workshop took up a different form of the tar sands’ challenge: to communities, to unionized and migrant workers, to the Global South, to climate stability, to native–non-native relations, and to environmental movements.
Following the plenary session, the conference closed with a People’s Assembly. Five workshops considering different issues involved in tar sands resistance were followed by five more, bringing together activists in different regions of Toronto and Ontario.
Piping tar sands oil east
Line 9 was built in 1975 to transport imported oil from Montreal to refineries in Sarnia. Enbridge has now applied to Canada’s National Energy Board to reverse its direction of flow, so that it can pipe Alberta oil to Montreal. The pipeline giant admits that among the possible uses of Line 9 is transport of “heavy oil,” a category that includes bitumen, the hazardous raw material extracted from tar sands.
Tar sands profiteers now face the prospect of declining demand and prices in the U.S., while plans to export the product to the west coast have run into a wall of popular opposition in British Colombia. The oil giants have responded with projects to ship their raw product east to Montreal and the Atlantic Coast for export.
This puts them and their government backers on a collision course with communities in Ontario and Quebec that could be victims of tar-sands pipeline leaks and ruptures.
The November 17 conference highlighted the role of First Nations both as victims of the tar sands threat and as leaders in resisting it.
In the plenary session, Vanessa Gray, a youth organizer from Aamjiwnaang First Nation, spoke of the dilemma of youth in her community. Aamjiwnaang residents’ health is severely undermined by pollution from oil refineries in nearby Sarnia, a present destination of tar sands bitumen. Indigenous young people “are starting from a hopeless place … frustrated and scared,” Gray said. “They are willing to fight for a better future but can’t do this on their own. They need support and help and encouragement.”
Aaron Detlor of the Haudenosaunee (Six Nations) Development Institute also launched a challenge to the audience, relating to Enbridge’s Line 9. “We don’t see how movement of tar sands products helps develop sustainable communities,” he said. “Enbridge says they don’t need to talk to us. We are sceptical about a court process. We have our own process… The next step is a cease and desist order from the chiefs.”
The meaning of such an order was spelled out by Haudenosaunee land defender Wes Elliott, using the example of a recent dispute with a giant corporation, Samsung. “We issued a cease and desist order…. They refused to discuss with us,” he said. “That night, word went out to our allies. With ten hours notice we had at least a hundred people [on the disputed site], some of whom are in this room. Samsung then negotiated with our Confederacy.”
Following the incident, the chiefs made an unprecedented declaration thanking the allies. “Things can be done when you have allies,” Elliot said.
“We are at a crossroads,” Detlor explained. Given the possibility of a cease and desist order, “we need to come up with some strategic means for developing a relationship among the different groups here today, and come up with something concrete.”
‘We now have the support of 80%’
Art Sterritt, Executive Director of Coastal First Nations, described how such a strategic alliance has been forged in British Columbia. A decade ago, the ten component peoples of Coastal First Nations had united all stakeholders in their region around a plan for sustainable development, winning agreement from the B.C. government in 2001.
Then Enbridge announced its “Northern Gateway” project to pipe and ship tar sands bitumen across the Great Bear Rainforest – the lands of Coastal First Nations. “It was a bomb that would destroy everything we stood for,” said Sterritt. “So we declared a ban on tanker traffic in the Great Bear Rainforest.”
To make the ban effective, the First Nations had to go beyond the 20,000 members of their alliance and “win all the people in B.C.,” Sterritt said.
“We now have support of 80 percent to stop Northern Gateway. That is what you will need to do to stop Line 9.”
Prime Minister Stephen Harper is determined to drive the Enbridge pipeline through, regardless. “So we are getting ready legally, politically, and with direct action,” Sterritt said. At a rally of five thousand protesters in Victoria, October 22, Sterritt asked who is prepared, if Harper bulls ahead, “to lie down in front of the bulldozers. They all said, ‘We will’ – men, women, and children. And I have ten thousand personal pledges to do just that.”
The final speaker in the plenary session was Maude Barlow, chairperson of the Council of Canadians. “We must fight the expansion of the tar sands, the most terrible energy product in the world,” she said. “We have to stop the growth of the pipelines. If we can stop the arteries, we can halt growth of tar sands extraction.”
In British Columbia, “132 First Nations communities say [to Enbridge], you will not pass.” The people of eastern Canada must now build an equally effective alliance. “What we do here in the East is for the whole world,” Barlow said.
“The oil companies have more money than we can ever dream of. But we have the passion of our people, … and with the outpouring of support we are receiving from all over the continent we will confront big oil and protect our lands and our rights.”
Time for action
Only two months ago, almost no one in Toronto had heard of the Line 9 threat. Energetic educational work has now alerted a wide range of progressive activists, and the pipeline controversy has begun receiving coverage in major media.
The November 17 teach-in was not geared to the discussion or adoption of specific proposals, but the unexpectedly large turn-out delivered a clear message from the grass roots: there is a strong basis to begin organizing broadened education and collective action to stop Line 9.
That is the challenge now facing climate justice activists in Toronto and southern Ontario.
Line 9’s Quebec Connection
Enbridge’s Line 9 project endangers communities in Quebec as much as in Ontario. Line 9 runs to Montreal; a previous Enbridge blueprint, called Trailbreaker, projected shipping Line 9 oil through the Eastern Townships and New England.
The Trailbreaker plan suffered shipwreck in Quebec. Citizens of Dunham, in alliance with Équiterre, were able to block construction of a Trailbreaker pumping station in their community.
Responding to a questioner from Montreal, Art Sterritt recalled the response of Quebec deputies in Ottawa when Coastal First Nations asked the House of Commons to approve its ban on tanker traffic in the Great Bear Rainforest.
“The Bloc Québécois all voted to ban the tankers,” he said. “People in Quebec get it. They have this feeling they’re being suppressed, like what is happening with First Nations. Now you’re getting a taste of it. Look at what happens in Quebec; that’s coming to you.”
Collaboration of ecology activists on both sides of the Ottawa River has been aided by several recent initiatives of Alternatives. In November 2010, Alternatives delegates addressed a Toronto conference on “Building a Global Movement for Climate Justice. Six months later, dozens of Ontario activists took part in an Alternatives conference in Montreal on the same topic. Alternatives was among the lead sponsors of Power Shift conference in October 2012, which drew 1,500 young ecology activists to Ottawa.
All experience indicates that Enbridge’s Line 9 plans will not win easy acceptance in Quebec. – JR
John Riddell is a Toronto-based ecojustice activist. “The Tar Sands Come to Ontario: No Line 9” was organized by an ad-hoc committee and was held in conjunction with the November 16-18 OPIRG Toronto+York Rebuilding Bridges conference.
To contact the organizing committee, write firstname.lastname@example.org or go to http://t.grupoapoyo.org.
Previously posted on Rabble.ca