However, it appears that in addition to our primary targets, we will be forced to deal with an additional one: the attempt of the Peres Center for Peace to integrate into the Forum, with the active assistance of the Spanish Foreign Ministry.
The involvement of a government ministry in a social forum is, in and of itself, a serious violation of the Porto Alegre charter, which established the absolute independence of the social forums from the government. Yet the problem is not only statutory but absolutely political: what are bodies that openly support neoliberalism and the war doing with a conference that is entirely in opposition to neoliberalism and the war??!!! This is not the first time that this quasi-governmental entity attempts to sneak into a conference of non-governmental organizations, and we have reviewed other attempts in the past (see, for example, “The Case against Palestinian Normalization with Israel”and “Peace NGO Conference in Florence: A Fraud and a Mystification”). However, this time the matter is more serious, as a majority of the participants perceive the forum in Madrid as being anti-Annapolis, and it is unacceptable that blatant supporters of Annapolis will be present to seek converts for their plan of war, a plan being created right before our eyes.
The social forums do not make political policies, but rely on international law, UN decisions and human and peoples’ rights as defined in international conventions. As such, they support the realization of the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people—the right to self-determination, the right of return—with no conditions and with no exceptions. Any attempt to trade the right of return for the right to a state, sovereignty for settlement blocs, withdrawal to the borders of pre-1967 in return for “sovereignty in greater Jerusalem” contradicts international law and the spirit of the social forums.
This is not to close the social forums, including the thematic social forum of Madrid, to any organization, on condition that it truly is a non-governmental organization and not a political party, but it must be clear that this is not a supermarket in which all opinions, including those supporting war and annexation, are legitimate. In order to ensure that the Palestinian and Arab delegations do not feel that we set for them a trap, the organizing committee of Madrid’s social forum published a reference document, in the name of the forum, which amongst other things determined that “the Oslo Process and the Road Map which followed ignored the basic requirements of justice and therefore failed in establishing peace, security or prosperity in the Middle East…The basic requirements for justice are only possible with an end to the Israeli occupation and colonization of the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem; the recognition and facilitation of the rights of Palestinian refugees, including their right to return to their lands (in accordance with UN General Assembly Resolution 194 (III)); and end to the system of racial discrimination against Palestinian citizens of Israel…” (for the full reference document, see “Forum For a Just Peace in the Middle East: Madrid, a Space for Peace—Reference Document”).
Only a position founded on these principles can ensure a just peace in our region. It is the polar opposite of the spirit of Annapolis and the declaration of principles that will be published—if at all—in its wake.
Within the framework of this absolutely clear position of the Forum in Madrid, everyone is welcome.