<?xml 
version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet title="XSL formatting" type="text/xsl" href="https://www.alterinter.org/spip.php?page=backend.xslt" ?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
>

<channel xml:lang="en">
	<title>Alternatives International</title>
	<link>https://www.alterinter.org/</link>
	<description>We are social and political movements struggling against social injustices, neoliberalism, imperialism and war. We are building solidarity between social movements at the local, national and international level. More...</description>
	<language>en</language>
	<generator>SPIP - www.spip.net</generator>
	<atom:link href="https://www.alterinter.org/spip.php?id_auteur=9978&amp;page=backend" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

	



<item xml:lang="en">
		<title>Niqab-wearing accuser vs. defendant rights: When Charter freedoms clash</title>
		<link>https://www.alterinter.org/?Niqab-wearing-accuser-vs-defendant-rights-When-Charter-freedoms-clash</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.alterinter.org/?Niqab-wearing-accuser-vs-defendant-rights-When-Charter-freedoms-clash</guid>
		<dc:date>2011-12-31T22:19:30Z</dc:date>
		<dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:creator>MARIA KARI </dc:creator>



		<description>
&lt;p&gt;The tone of the Supreme Court of Canada on Thursday was tense as Justice Morris Fish asked lawyer David Butt to name one lawyer who'd willingly cross-examine a veiled witness.
&lt;br class='autobr' /&gt;
Butt replied &#034;some blind lawyers that I know&#034; which was met with an impatient &#034;Well, how about seeing lawyers &#8212; your response quite explicitly and dramatically answers the question.&#034; The question before the Court was whether a witness testifying while wearing the niqab &#8212; a veil which covers the face with only the eyes (&#8230;)&lt;/p&gt;


-
&lt;a href="https://www.alterinter.org/?-January-2012-" rel="directory"&gt;January 2012&lt;/a&gt;


		</description>


 <content:encoded>&lt;div class='rss_chapo'&gt;&lt;p&gt;The tone of the Supreme Court of Canada on Thursday was tense as Justice Morris Fish asked lawyer David Butt to name one lawyer who'd willingly cross-examine a veiled witness.&lt;br class='autobr' /&gt;
Butt replied &#034;some blind lawyers that I know&#034; which was met with an impatient &#034;Well, how about seeing lawyers &#8212; your response quite explicitly and dramatically answers the question.&#034; The question before the Court was whether a witness testifying while wearing the niqab &#8212; a veil which covers the face with only the eyes showing &#8212; would undermine the fairness of a trial.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
		&lt;div class='rss_texte'&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;http://rabble.ca/news/2011/12/niqab-wearing-accuser-vs-rights-defendants-when-charter-protected-freedoms-clash&#034; class=&#034;spip_out&#034; rel=&#034;external&#034;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Read more...&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
		
		</content:encoded>


		

	</item>



</channel>

</rss>
