Insult to Injury: The Impact of USAID Withdrawal on Nepal’s Community Development

The termination of 34 projects worth an estimated $329 million has disrupted healthcare, education, energy, and infrastructure development efforts, affecting over 400 organizations and placing an estimated 30,000 to 35,000 youth jobs at risk (Bhattarai, 2025). These projects were meant to boost Nepal’s progress in the direction of achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly in rural and marginalized communities. The timing of this withdrawal couldn’t be more wrong as it coincides with Nepal’s anticipated graduation from Least Developed Country (LDC) status, compounds its impact and introduces heightened uncertainty for the nation’s economic and social future. This reflects a severe loss of resources as well as breach of trust in the continuity of global development partnerships. If left unaddressed, the consequences may reverse years of development progress and deepen inequalities. Nepal now faces the dual challenge of sustaining its momentum while navigating a more constrained international support landscape.

One of the most immediate consequences of the aid withdrawal has been felt in the health sector. Programs previously funded by USAID including maternal and child health, HIV/AIDS prevention, and nutrition support that have been halted, putting vulnerable populations at renewed risk (Nepal Monitor, 2025). Community health posts and clinics that relied on these programs now face medication shortages, staffing gaps, and reduced outreach capacity. These setbacks are particularly alarming in rural areas, where public health systems remain fragile. Experts warn of rising morbidity and mortality rates if essential services are not quickly restored. The absence of health education initiatives also threatens to lower awareness of hygiene, nutrition, and reproductive health. These setbacks are operational, and they have long-term implications for national health outcomes and economic productivity. The health gains of the past decade now stand on uncertain ground.

The education sector has experienced similar disruption. Programs that once supported access to quality education through scholarships, infrastructure development, and teacher training have been discontinued (Poudel, 2025). This is especially harmful for children in remote and underserved areas, who face increased dropout risks and reduced learning opportunities. With fewer resources for inclusive education, gains in literacy and gender parity are at risk of stalling or reversing. The interruption of teacher capacity-building programs leaves educators without the tools to adapt curricula or reach vulnerable learners. School communities that were beginning to thrive under international support now face stagnation. These challenges compromise both the right to education and Nepal’s broader human capital development goals. Without renewed support, an entire generation could be left behind.

In the energy and infrastructure sectors, suspended projects include road improvements and electricity transmission line expansions, especially in remote regions (Sharma, 2025). These infrastructure investments were intended to boost economic inclusion, improve access to services, and reduce regional disparities. Their termination not only halts progress but threatens to widen the development gap between urban and rural Nepal. Businesses reliant on better connectivity and energy security may delay expansion or reduce operations. Local governments, already limited in capacity and resources, are unable to fully absorb or continue these large-scale projects. The development slowdown undermines Nepal’s ambition for inclusive and climate-resilient growth. In the absence of alternatives, entire communities risk continued marginalization from national development.

The economic fallout from these suspended projects has been severe. With over 30,000 workers suddenly unemployed, the aid cut has triggered an economic shock, particularly among community workers, healthcare professionals, and logistical staff (Giri, 2025). Many of these individuals had received specialized training funded through international programs, raising concerns about a potential brain drain as skilled labor seeks stability abroad. The psychosocial impact on families facing job loss and income insecurity cannot be underestimated. This surge in unemployment exacerbates existing social vulnerabilities, particularly among women and youth who had found employment in development-related roles. It also undermines the resilience of civil society organizations, which have lost not only funding but also experienced human resources. Without immediate mitigation, these losses could cripple Nepal’s community development sector for years to come.

Nepal’s upcoming graduation from LDC status once heralded as a milestone now adds complexity to this fragile situation. Graduation is expected to lead to the loss of preferential trade access, concessional financing, and eligibility for certain forms of technical assistance (Shekh, 2025). These privileges have been essential to Nepal’s development gains and institutional strengthening. According to Bhattarai (2025), the overlap of LDC graduation and sudden aid withdrawal places Nepal’s SDG targets under severe threat. Graduation is meant to signal readiness and resilience but in Nepal’s case, it risks becoming symbolic rather than substantive. Unless paired with strong transitional mechanisms, the shift may cause regression rather than growth. Nepal’s development partners must not confuse formal graduation with full economic security.

In light of these challenges, it is imperative that international actors re-evaluate their responsibilities during Nepal’s transition. Organizations like Alternatives Montréal, and first world governments including Canada’s, have a responsibility role to play in bridging this gap. Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and track record of LDC support position it as a key ally through funding continuity, technical support, and international advocacy (Government of Canada, 2023; United Nations, n.d.). Institutions from the Global North, particularly those committed to equity and sustainable development, must demonstrate their solidarity in practice. This moment calls for more than statements as it requires resources, collaboration, and policy coordination. Development cooperation must be recalibrated to protect the most vulnerable during economic transitions. Nepal’s success should not be measured by the label of LDC graduation alone, but by its ability to sustain inclusive growth in its aftermath.

In conclusion, the cessation of USAID funding has dealt a critical blow to Nepal’s development ecosystem, especially as the country stands on the brink of LDC graduation. What should have been a moment of empowerment has instead exposed structural vulnerabilities and raised serious questions about donor accountability. If left unaddressed, this intersection of aid withdrawal and systemic transition could derail years of progress and weaken Nepal’s developmental foundations. Yet this crisis also offers an opportunity to reimagine more just and effective models of international cooperation. With strategic partnerships, resilient institutions, and committed allies, Nepal can still navigate this crossroads. But it will require the international community to act not only with urgency but with genuine responsibility.

References

1. Bhattarai, A. (March 2025). “Graduation from LDC and SDG targets under threat”. The Kathmandu Post. Retrieved from: https://kathmandupost.com/interviews/2025/03/31/graduation-from-ldc-and-sdg-targets-under-threat
2. Tanjid, O. (March 2025). “US Halts $329 Million in Aid to Nepal, Impacting 34 Development Projects”. Nepal Monitor. Retrieved from: https://nepalmonitor.com/2025/03/12/us-halts-aid-to-nepal/
3. Poudel, K. (March 2025). “US suspension of grant: Impact on Nepal”. Spotlight Nepal. Retrieved from: https://www.spotlightnepal.com/2025/03/10/us-suspesion-grant-impact-nepal/
4. Sharma, G. (February 2025). “US grants for two key Nepal infrastructure projects suspended after Trump order”. Reuters. Retrieved from: https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/us-grants-two-key-nepal-infrastructure-projects-suspended-after-trump-order-2025-02-20/
5. Giri, A. (March 2025). “In Nepal, US pulls the plug on aid projects worth Rs46.12 billion”. Kathmandu Post. Retrieved from: https://kathmandupost.com/national/2025/03/12/in-nepal-us-pulls-the-plug-on-aid-projects-worth-rs46-12-billion
6. Shekh, I. A., Bhattarai, S. K., & Thapa, R. (2025). “In perspective: Nepal’s LDC graduation: Implications, opportunities, and pathways”. Local Economy, 39(3-4), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/02690942251315682
7. op. cit.
8. Government of Canada. (2023). “Canada’s Indo Pacific Strategy”. Retrieved from: https://www.international.gc.ca/transparency-transparence/indo-pacific-indo-pacifique/index.aspx?lang=eng#a1_1
9. United Nations (July 2023). “LDC Portal – International Support Measures for Least Developed Countries”. Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/ldcportal/tags/canada

Photo credit